Sunday, February 27, 2011
Measurment
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Week 6 Post
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
Week 5 Post
After going over the readings for this week, I was able to compare man things from them to the classroom that I work in. From the “Student Mistakes” article I was able to draw many similarities from the kindergarten classroom to the first grade classroom that I’m in. One of the first things I saw was the use of the calendar and how the students use counting techniques. One aspect of the calendar that I really like about how my CT uses it, is that she has the students tell the next numbers for the calendar and then has each number with a different color and pattern on it. The students then get to guess the pattern and need to get the correct number, pattern, and color for the number to go up. Following the calendar technique, I’ve also noticed that my first graders sometimes show signs of how the kindergartners would say “60” as a “5 and a 9” then a “5 and a 10”. When something like this does happen, usually the student picks up the mistake or has help from the other students in the classroom. Another common mistake that the article showed was students seeing numbers like 730 as 70+30+0. I have seen many mistakes like this in my class when comparing larger numbers. For some reason place value in the hundreds place is difficult for them. Place value is a very important aspect to math learning and something I feel that needs to be drilled into students at a young age so they can get a really solid grasp on it.
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Week 4
I am glad to have read the Smith and Stein article, as I know have a set of guidelines to check the level of thinking involved with a given problem. This article highlighted the importance of task selection. It made me more aware that there are different levels of thinking involved with different types of questions. However after reading the article I still have a few questions. The concluding paragraph of the article says, “in this article we shared our findings concerning the importance of beginning with a task that has the potential to engage students at a high level…” I wonder what they mean by beginning? The beginning of a class period? Homework assignment? Unit? Lesson? The answer is probably all of the above. But then I ask, when are low-level thinking questions relevant?
In the Kabiri and Smith article I learned how important it is to base instruction of problems with different solution approaches and many levels of the solution. It promotes higher-level thinking for the whole class and an equal opportunity for all students to succeed. It was very helpful to see examples of how to turn a traditional problem into an open-ended problem. Specifically, the algebra problem reminded me an assignment that I was given in my high school algebra class. Each student was assigned five numbers, for example 5, 5, 3, 6, 7, and was asked to use any combination of operations and parentheses to compute the numbers 0-100. The problem was open ended and allowed students to be creative with a multitude of solutions. I specifically remember feeling extremely proud of myself at the end of the assignment.